Thread Summary
The forum discussion involves multiple topics, including a disagreement over sharing information related to a treasure hunt, concerns about privacy and copyright infringement, and discussions on forum etiquette and collaboration. Doghousereiley is frustrated with the lack of cooperation from other members, while Burnstyle accuses them of being aggressive. Mediation attempts are made by Erpobdelliforme and Unknown. The conversation escalates with accusations of hypocrisy and lack of collaboration. Additionally, there are discussions about content removal requests, copyright protection, DCMA notices, and inquiries about broken links and contributing information. The tone of the discussion varies from serious copyright concerns to lighthearted banter. Overall, the discussion highlights tensions around sharing information, communication issues, and concerns about privacy and copyright within the forum community.
Erpobdelliforme
Unknown:
thats a relief
Happy to help. Now about that PM I sent you? Would you mind responding?
TIA
burnstyle
Doghousereiley wrote::
Burnstyle
Good luck with the sharing
I asked for someone on the forum to share info and I was told by the guy who runs the Facebook age that
You have no right to any info and any one on the forum has no obligation to share info
If you asked twice you are accused of lying and harrassment
So be careful. A lot of the old timers do not want to share what they know
No wonder the spirit on the forum is sour. Too bad good words are not followed by the appropriate actions
Again,
You asked Wilhouse to share the location that byron preiss said the casque was NOT at. Wilhouse told you that he would not share that because there is a private residence on top of that site now, and he didn't want to draw attention to the residents of that house. Then you spammed every single post on the page asking the same question and accusing Wilhouse of being deceptive. THEN you started private messaging Wilhouse and myself, insulting us because Wilhouse wouldn't tell you the address of some random persons house.
You weren't blocked from the page, you can still comment and contribute (though you have not done either of those things)
I think we already addressed this here:
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=6980&p=134290#p134290
Your comments weren't removed from facebook either, so I can provide links to those too if you would like.
Doghousereiley
Erpobdelliforme. I did not get a pm
fenix
agressive and hostile.
wow that is a first. or is it a joke. I guess you can't call out hypocrisy either
I just asked. as you said you don't have to answer. as you pointed out you don't have to do anything at all
I sent pm as you asked. you did not respond to that. but you do to this
so I am confused as to what your understanding really is
Doghousereiley
I never got any reply to any of my questions from anyone
Nothing about a private house. NOTHING
but thank you for finally clearing that up
Doghousereiley
and your reply is does not make sense
IF PRIESS SAID IT WAS NOT THERE THEN WHY WOUlD I GO BOTHER THEM. That is idiotic
as I stated in my initial question. I did not want to waste my time digging where other knew there was no casque
You could have made it simple and said that about the private house BUT instead you decide to start the fire
and now your bullshit post about sharing
Are you people serious?
Erpobdelliforme
Unknown:
Erpobdelliforme. I did not get a pm
I re-sent it. The favor of your reply is appreciated.
burnstyle
Doghousereiley wrote::
and your reply is does not make sense
IF PRIESS SAID IT WAS NOT THERE THEN WHY WOUlD I GO BOTHER THEM. That is idiotic
as I stated in my initial question. I did not want to waste my time digging where other knew there was no casque
You could have made it simple and said that about the private house BUT instead you decide to start the fire
and now your bullshit post about sharing
Are you people serious?
Again. No one likes a fibber.
https://i.imgur.com/GHJlM0W.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/sSc5ig6.jpg
Doghousereiley
I sent reply
Doghousereiley
I think you provided my point that you say you have no obligation and really no intention of any
SPIRIT OF OPENNESS AND COLLABORATION
Thank you
Doghousereiley
you did not post the first part of the conversation. I know we live in a world where people love to take just a small fraction of a conversation and say it proves their point
IN THE SPIRIT OF OPENNESS AND COLLABOARTION. PRINT MY QUESTIONS AND YOUR RESPONSES. NOT JUST YOUR CHOOSEN EXCERPTS
DocCovert
Thanks burnstyle, this'll keep me busy for whatever is left of my life!
Hirudiniforme
Hirudiniforme wrote::
What do you mean? I can see it just fine. Burnstyle, is the site OK? Malted or JM, do you know anything about this?
maltedfalcon wrote::
you must have your browser set to cache... clear your cache and refresh the link - its definitely not there.
Telling me I should clear my cache
Believing that is what i am referring to
Hirudiniforme
burnstyle wrote::
A couple of veterans have asked for some stuff to be removed.
The two are very well respected here, and will remain nameless. We have taken SF and Roanoke down temporarily so they can be gone through. Some of the images were taken during digs they were on (from what I understand) and they want to make sure certain things (like their faces) aren't in the images.
You sure it doesn't have anything to do with this?
maltedfalcon
Hirudiniforme wrote::
Sure It does Dave,
That was the DCMA notice I sent you when you published my photographs without my permission, You remember?
Same thing.
Right after that I apologized for being so brusque with you. Did you not receive my apology?
Matt
Erpobdelliforme
Unknown:
Someone call the internet police
Nah, it's just a simple 10-16. No need to notify the authorities, yet.
Hirudiniforme
maltedfalcon wrote::
Sure It does Dave,
That was the DCMA notice I sent you when you published my photographs without my permission, You remember?
Same thing.
Right after that I apologized for being so brusque with you. Did you not receive my apology?
Matt
Hi, Matt.
Do I remember? I haven't stopped laughing about it yet.
I got your apology. Still enjoying that, too.
I look forward to your future correspondence.
Dave
erexere
I thought it was okay to post someone's work as long as you make alterations like drawing a penis diagram over it...
Surely there is no copyright protection for penis art, right?
Hirudiniforme
erexere wrote::
Surely there is no copyright protection for penis art, right?
TAKEDOWN NOTICE:
You have quoted my penis.
I am the owner of said penis.
Take my penis out of your mouth immediately.
Thank you
erexere
Sounds like a bad date.
BINGO
Burnstyle,
Just checking to see if the Boston link is dead or if you guys just don’t have a database built for it yet?
Either way, I appreciate the gesture.
If we come up with or have some information that might be considered useful, is there a good way to share or add it to the collection?
drunknerds
erexere wrote::
I thought it was okay to post someone's work as long as you make alterations like drawing a penis diagram over it...
Surely there is no copyright protection for penis art, right?
Giant pole, Giant step...
Urban Smurf, you've solved the last piece of the puzzle: We haven't been able to find the pole because no one has spray painted it over the dig site, yet.